Waterproofing Failures in Australia: A 10-Year Review (2015–2025)

Leaky bathrooms & leaking balconies in Australia

Water ingress from failed waterproofing is one of the most widespread building defect issues in Australia. Over the past decade, many residential buildings – especially bathrooms, showers and balconies in apartments and houses – have experienced leaks due to waterproofing failures. This report examines the prevalence of these defects, their common causes, and the financial impacts on homeowners and industry. It also compares regulatory settings in different states (with a focus on Victoria and New South Wales) and highlights trends, case studies, and government interventions aimed at reducing waterproofing failures.

Caulfield Bathroom Renovation

Caulfield Bathroom Renovation

Prevalence of Waterproofing Defects in Residential Buildings

National Overview: Multiple studies consistently show that a large share of Australian buildings suffer from waterproofing problems. In modern multi-unit residential buildings (e.g. apartments), between 20% and 40% of buildings have some form of waterproofing defect​ (ACIL Allen, 2024)​. For example, a 2023 New South Wales survey found 42% of new strata apartment buildings had serious waterproofing issues​ (ACIL Allen, 2024). Similarly, a federal report in 2021 noted roughly 30% of buildings had external leaks (e.g. from balconies or through shower floors)​ (ACIL Allen, 2024). Even commercial and public buildings are affected – one survey of managers of non-residential buildings found about 21% had waterproofing or weatherproofing defects (e.g. roof leaks)​ (ACIL Allen, 2024). In short, leaking showers, bathrooms and balconies have been among the most common defects in Australian construction over the last decade.

Victoria-Specific Insights: Victoria faces similar waterproofing challenges. A recent analysis by Cladding Safety Victoria found that about 73% of all balcony defects in Victorian buildings were caused by water ingress – mainly due to inadequate waterproofing or poor drainage workmanship​ (vic.gov.au). Both newer and older buildings are impacted (around half of the water-related balcony issues were in buildings less than 10 years old)​ (vic.gov.au). The Victorian Building Authority (VBA) also reports that water damage is “one of the most common problems” in building defect complaints and warranty insurance claims​(vba.vic.gov.au). In fact, the VBA’s proactive inspections frequently flag wet-area waterproofing and drainage as top risk areas needing better compliance​ (vba.vic.gov.au). These findings underscore that Victoria’s homes – from high-rise apartments to suburban houses – are not exempt from the national pattern of waterproofing failures.

Common Causes of Waterproofing Failures

Waterproofing systems typically fail due to poor installation practices, design shortcomings, or material breakdown. Key causes include:

  • Poor Workmanship: Inadequate application of membranes is the leading culprit. Examples include missing coverage in critical areas (e.g. not extending waterproofing up shower walls or into corners), improper sealing of joints and penetrations, and incorrect installation of drainage outlets such as puddle flanges​ (wabuildinginspections.com.au). Such errors leave gaps where water can escape the intended barrier. A Victorian study confirmed that many balcony leaks stem from insufficient waterproofing layers or sloppy installation, pointing to contractor workmanship as a root cause​ (vic.gov.au)

  • Design and Detailing Flaws: Even if applied correctly, a waterproofing system can be undermined by design issues. Lack of proper falls/slope in shower floors or balcony decks can lead to pooling water that eventually finds a way through joints. Poor drainage design or undersized outlets exacerbate water buildup. Likewise, complex junctions (e.g. balcony door interfaces, wall-floor joints) that are not detailed with appropriate flashings or upturns often become leak points. Some surveys have noted that improper drainage systems on balconies are a frequent factor in water ingress issues​ (vic.gov.au).

  • Material Failure and Aging: Over time, waterproofing membranes can degrade or lose effectiveness – especially if substandard products were used. UV exposure on rooftop or balcony membranes, building movement (settlement or thermal expansion) causing cracks, and general wear-and-tear can all lead to eventual leaks​ (goldstarbathrooms.com.au). While many major failures occur soon after construction due to initial defects, even a well-built wet area can leak after years if the membrane or sealant has deteriorated. Regular maintenance (e.g. re-caulking edges) is needed to prevent aging-related leaks, but often this is neglected.

  • Other Contributing Factors: Some water issues arise from adjacent building defects rather than the waterproofing layer itself. For instance, plumbing leaks inside walls or slabs can mimic waterproofing failures. Blocked or poorly installed drainage pipes can overflow water into areas not designed to handle moisture. In many cases, however, these are intertwined (e.g. a clogged drain together with missing waterproofing compound a balcony leak). Overall, the vast majority of shower, bathroom, and balcony leaks trace back to a failure to correctly implement robust waterproofing during construction, whether by human error or design oversight.

Financial Impact of Waterproofing Failures

South Melbourne Bathroom Renovation

South Melbourne Bathroom Renovation

Repair and Rectification Costs: The cost to investigate and fix waterproofing failures can be substantial. On an individual dwelling level, a single leaking shower or balcony often requires stripping out finishes and re-installing membranes – easily costing several thousand dollars per incident. A study of moisture damage in Victorian homes found external water ingress defects cost on average about $5,700 to remediate per defect​ (ACIL Allen, 2024)​. Leaks that cause extensive structural or interior damage drive costs much higher. Industry surveys indicate that for apartments with major waterproofing problems (e.g. widespread internal leaks), the repair bill can exceed $20,000–$30,000 per apartment​ (ACIL Allen, 2024). Even “minor” leaks still average around $5,000+ per apartment to fix​ (ACIL Allen, 2024). For example, rectifying a typical balcony waterproofing failure (removing and rebuilding a balcony surface) is estimated around $20k–$25k per balcony in direct costs​ (ACIL Allen, 2024).

When aggregated across whole buildings and the broader industry, these failures represent a multi-million dollar problem. The NSW strata defects survey in 2023 found the average total defect rectification cost was about $160,000 per affected apartment building (not all for waterproofing alone)​ (ACIL Allen, 2024). Across Australia, the annual economic cost of waterproofing defects in new construction has been estimated between $121 million and $314 million per year for the residential apartment sector​ (ACIL Allen, 2024). If commercial buildings and public buildings are included, the potential cost rises to as high as $1.2 billion per year in avoidable expenses​ (ACIL Allen, 2024). These figures account for direct repair costs and some secondary impacts, and they underline how prevalent – and expensive – water ingress issues have become in the built environment.

Insurance Claims and Legal Disputes: Failed waterproofing also generates significant downstream financial impacts in the form of insurance claims and litigation. Home warranty insurers (like the Victorian Managed Insurance Authority for domestic building) see a steady stream of claims related to water damage in new homes​ (vba.vic.gov.au). Many home insurance policies exclude defects or gradual water ingress, leaving owners to pursue builders through legal action if the builder is still within warranty. Disputes over responsibility are common – builders may deny liability after the statutory warranty period, and insurers may reject claims if work was non-compliant​ (wabuildinginspections.com.au). This scenario often forces owners’ corporations (in apartments) or homeowners to fund repairs out-of-pocket and then engage in legal battles against builders, subcontractors, or insurers. The cumulative legal costs and economic loss (e.g. lost rental income, property value impacts) can rival the direct repair costs. A 2019 analysis estimated that fixing defects in apartments built in the prior decade would cost around $6.2 billion nationally (excluding legal costs)​ (aph.gov.au) – and a large portion of those defects were waterproofing-related. In extreme cases, defects from water ingress have rendered buildings uninhabitable, leading to expensive evacuations and litigation (as seen in a few high-profile apartment tower defect crises). All told, waterproofing failures impose a heavy financial burden on homeowners, insurers, and the construction industry alike.

Regulatory Differences Between States (Victoria vs New South Wales)

Building regulations and licensing requirements for waterproofing work differ across Australia’s states, which has implications for defect rates and accountability. New South Wales (NSW) generally has more stringent controls on waterproofing installations. In NSW, any residential waterproofing work must be done by a licensed waterproofer (or licensed builder) for jobs above a low value threshold ​(nsw.gov.au). Contractors must demonstrate the required qualifications and experience to obtain a waterproofing licence in NSW​ (nsw.gov.au). Furthermore, since 2021 NSW’s Design and Building Practitioners Act has classified waterproofing as a critical building element – requiring designs to be done or signed off by registered practitioners and subjecting the work to regulated inspections​ (NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023). These reforms mean that in NSW there is a clear chain of responsibility and minimum competency standards for those doing waterproofing on building sites.

In Victoria, the rules have historically been less direct. There is no standalone “waterproofer” licence class for general building work. Instead, waterproofing in domestic construction falls under the oversight of a registered builder. A builder (registered with the VBA) is responsible for ensuring wet-area waterproofing complies with standards, and they must certify the work for the building surveyor​ (bljbuilding.com.au). Specialist subcontractors in Victoria can perform waterproofing, but if the value of the work exceeds a certain amount (currently $10,000), it must either be done by a registered builder or a subcontractor who holds a limited builder registration in waterproofing​ (bljbuilding.com.au). In practice, many waterproofers in Victoria operate under a builder’s supervision without their own license. This difference – licensing in NSW vs builder sign-off in VIC – is often cited as a factor in quality variation. However, Victoria is now moving toward tighter regulation of trades: plans were announced to introduce direct registration/licensing for key trades, with waterproofing slated to be included in the next phase​ (bljbuilding.com.au).

Aside from licensing, both states have similar technical standards (Australian Standards AS3740 for internal waterproofing, AS4654 for external, as referenced by the National Construction Code). One notable legal difference is the definition of a “major defect” in statutory warranties: both NSW and Victoria include waterproofing failures as major structural defects by law, which extends the warranty liability period (6 years in NSW; 10 years limitation of action in Victoria)​. This ensures builders can be held liable for serious leaks for a longer time. Overall, NSW’s regulatory regime in the past few years has been more aggressive in directly targeting waterproofing issues (through mandatory practitioner licensing, declared designs, and active auditing), whereas Victoria has relied on general builder responsibility and is only recently strengthening trade oversight.

 Trends in Waterproofing Issues Over Time

Over the last decade, awareness of waterproofing defects has grown, and some positive trends are emerging in response to reforms. In the early 2010s, as the apartment construction boom accelerated, high rates of defects were recorded. By 2019, more than 70% of surveyed apartment buildings in eastern Australia (Vic/NSW/QLD) were found to have at least one defect, with water leaks among the most common issues​ (Equity Economics, 2019). High-profile failures – such as severe cracking and water ingress in certain new high-rise buildings – brought the issue to public attention around 2018–2019. This period can be seen as a “peak defect crisis” when industry confidence was shaken and governments commissioned expert reports on building quality.

Since about 2020, data suggest a slow improvement in the incidence of waterproofing failures in some regions. New South Wales provides a useful case study: the NSW Building Commissioner’s office began auditing new apartments in 2020, and initially 34% of buildings audited had serious waterproofing defects, but by 2021 this dropped to 27%​ (NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023). Officials noted a “trending decline” in waterproofing defects after 2019, attributing it to better oversight and builders paying more attention to compliance ​(NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023). By 2023, NSW still found waterproofing to be the number-one defect type (present in 42% of inspected buildings)​ (NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023), but the Building Commissioner reported that the severity and overall frequency of these issues were on a downward trajectory​ (NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023). In short, the problem remains widespread but there are early signs of progress where proactive measures are in place (e.g. rigorous inspections under new laws). In contrast, states that have not yet implemented major reforms may not show much change in defect rates over the decade.

Another notable trend is increasing industry capacity and education around waterproofing. The past 10 years saw the introduction of dedicated training (e.g. Certificate III in Waterproofing) and more certified products, as well as updates to standards (the NCC – National Construction Code 2022 and upcoming 2025 – includes enhanced waterproofing provisions). These should gradually improve new construction. Nonetheless, the legacy of thousands of buildings constructed with sub-par waterproofing in the 2010s means leaks will continue to emerge in existing housing stock. Many apartment Owners Corporations are only discovering defects a few years after completion, leading to a lag effect in statistics. Overall, the trend can be summarized as: persistent high incidence through the 2010s, reaching a tipping point around 2019, followed by incremental improvements in the early 2020s as reforms take hold.

Brighton Balcony Renovation

Brighton Balcony Renovation

Case Studies and Notable Reports

South Melbourne Bathroom Renovation

South Melbourne Bathroom Renovation

Over the decade, various studies and real-world cases have highlighted the scope of waterproofing failures:

  • “The Cost of Apartment Building Defects” (Equity Economics, 2019): This report quantified the financial burden of defects, estimating about $6.2 billion needed to fix apartment defects from the prior ten years​ (aph.gov.au). It found water ingress to be a major contributor to that cost. The report drew on data from the Australian Institute of Architects, which noted that roughly one-third of apartment owners had experienced “minor water problems” and a smaller share (4%) “major water problems” in their units​ (ACIL Allen Report, 2024). This study underscored the national scale of the issue and was cited in subsequent building industry inquiries.

  • “Cracks in the Compact City” (UNSW City Futures, 2021): A research project that collected strata owner experiences across NSW. It found around 29% of apartment owners reported water penetration issues (through walls or slabs) in their buildings​ (ACIL Allen Report, 2024). The report included case studies of residents dealing with chronic bathroom leaks and balcony water damage, illustrating the personal toll: damaged interiors, health impacts from mould, and financial stress from repairs. It advocated for stronger consumer protection and defect rectification schemes.

  • NSW Strata Defect Surveys NSW Strata Defect Surveys (2023): Carried out by the Office of the Building Commissioner, these surveys catalogued serious defects in new strata buildings. Both editions flagged waterproofing as the most prevalent defect category (42% of buildings in 2023 had serious waterproofing defects)​ (NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023). The 2023 report also provided case studies of projects where balconies had to be rebuilt or bathrooms retiled due to membrane failures (NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023). These high-profile government reports have been instrumental in guiding policy (e.g. informing the NSW Project Intervene program to fix defects early).

  • Cladding Safety Victoria – Balcony Defects Report Cladding Safety Victoria (2023): Although initiated to address cladding, this Victorian government analysis revealed that many buildings also had water ingress problems on balconies (36% of balconies inspected) even when excluding cladding issues​ (NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023). It offered specific examples of water-damaged structures and traced causes like missing waterproof membrane in slab joints. The report’s key message was that non-compliant waterproofing is pervasive and must be rectified alongside other safety issues (Cladding Safety Victoria 2023).

  • Notable Building Cases: Apart from reports, real-world defect crises have put waterproofing on the agenda. For instance, Mascot Towers in Sydney (built 2008) suffered structural cracking that some experts linked to long-term water penetration weakening the building’s foundation. Owners were evacuated in 2019 and faced repair bills over $30 million, demonstrating how unchecked leakage can escalate into a catastrophic failure. In Melbourne, there have been apartment complexes where balcony leaks led to falling concrete pieces (spalling), requiring urgent facade repairs. These cases, widely covered in the media, have pressured regulators to act and have educated the public on the consequences of poor waterproofing.

Government and Industry Responses

Recognizing the severity of waterproofing failures, governments and industry bodies have undertaken various interventions and reforms in recent years:

  • Stricter Building Codes: The Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB) has updated the National Construction Code to tighten waterproofing standards. New provisions in NCC 2022 (and further changes proposed for NCC 2025) aim to clarify and improve waterproofing requirements for wet areas and balconies​ (ACIL Allen Report, 2024). For example, there are improved guidelines on falls for shower floors and enhanced performance requirements for external waterproofing membranes. An impact analysis for these changes projected significant long-term savings by reducing defect rates​ (ACIL Allen Report, 2024).

  • Licensing and Training Reforms: As noted, NSW introduced compulsory licensing for waterproofers and a registration of “building element specialists” (like waterproofing design specialists) as part of the Design & Building Practitioners Act 2020. This ensures qualified persons take responsibility for waterproofing design and sign off on installation​ (NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023). Victoria, through its Building Reform Strategy, is working on a new trades registration framework which will include waterproofing as a registered trade in the near future​ (bljbuilding.com.au). Additionally, vocational training (Certificate III in Construction Waterproofing) has been promoted to upskill workers, and industry associations (e.g. Australian Institute of Waterproofing) have published best-practice guidelines and run workshops to raise competency.

  • Proactive Inspections and Audits: The Victorian Building Authority’s Proactive Inspections Program (PIP) now targets high-risk stages of construction for inspection – notably checking waterproofing in bathrooms before tiling is installed. The VBA has flagged waterproofing as a key focus due to frequent non-compliance, aiming to catch mistakes before they are concealed​ (vba.vic.gov.au). In NSW, the Office of the Building Commissioner conducts random audits of new multi-unit projects under the RAB Act (Residential Apartment Buildings Act 2020), often issuing stop-work or repair orders if serious waterproofing defects are found. These oversight programs have begun acting as a deterrent against cutting corners, as developers know there’s a chance defects will be spotted and must be fixed at their cost.

  • Extended Liability and Insurance Solutions: Lawmakers have amended warranty and defect liability schemes to better cover waterproofing. NSW updated its Home Building Act to explicitly categorize waterproofing defects as major defects, giving owners 6 years to claim repairs (rather than the usual 2 for minor issues)​. Victoria’s equivalent allows up to 10 years for action on such defects. On the insurance front, NSW has piloted a 10-year latent defects insurance for apartments (through programs like iCIRT and Decennial Liability Insurance)​ (NSW Strata Defects Survey, 2023)​. This insurance is meant to pay for defect rectification (including waterproofing failures) if the builder or developer will not. While not yet widespread, it represents a new safety net for owners and an incentive for builders to “build it right the first time.”

  • Guidance and Education: Both state governments and industry groups have issued technical guides to address common failure points. For example, the VBA released bulletins on proper balcony drainage design and correct installation of shower membranes. The ABCB and Standards Australia have published improved handbook content on waterproofing detailing. Campaigns to educate homeowners have also emerged (e.g. encouraging buyers to ask for waterproofing certificates and warranties). By spreading knowledge of why leaks occur and how to prevent them, these efforts aim to raise the overall quality of construction and maintenance.

Conclusion

Waterproofing failures in Australian residential buildings have been a persistent and costly problem over the last ten years. Bathrooms, showers, and balconies – if not properly waterproofed – can lead to pervasive defects that affect thousands of homes and apartments. The prevalence has been alarmingly high, but recent trends and reforms give reason for cautious optimism. Strengthened regulations, better training, and active enforcement are starting to curb defect rates. Nonetheless, continued vigilance is needed: builders and regulators must treat waterproofing with the same priority as structural integrity and fire safety, given its critical role in a building’s durability and livability. Homeowners and strata managers are likewise more alert to signs of leaks now, leading to earlier detection and repair. With ongoing improvements in standards and practitioner competency, the coming years should hopefully see a decline in the leaky shower and balcony syndrome that has plagued so many Australian buildings – saving residents from the stress and expense that past construction shortcomings have caused.

Next
Next

Common Causes of Balcony Leaks and How to Prevent Them